<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Continuous Integration isn&#8217;t a tool!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adeptechllc.com/2009/11/04/continuous-integration-isnt-a-tool/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adeptechllc.com/2009/11/04/continuous-integration-isnt-a-tool/</link>
	<description>Software, Agile Process and Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:48:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: What&#8217;s Done in an Agile Project? &#124; Adept Technologies</title>
		<link>http://www.adeptechllc.com/2009/11/04/continuous-integration-isnt-a-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-4679</link>
		<dc:creator>What&#8217;s Done in an Agile Project? &#124; Adept Technologies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 20:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adeptechllc.com/?p=259#comment-4679</guid>
		<description>[...] The sweet spot for most folks seems to be in building on a shared development server, with some sort of robust suite of tests to assure that new functionality is at least working per the tests, and that nothing that used to work was broken (subject always to the suite of tests being reasonable).  This most folks will recognize as Continuous Integration (although you should really read Continuous Integration isn&#8217;t a Tool!) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The sweet spot for most folks seems to be in building on a shared development server, with some sort of robust suite of tests to assure that new functionality is at least working per the tests, and that nothing that used to work was broken (subject always to the suite of tests being reasonable).  This most folks will recognize as Continuous Integration (although you should really read Continuous Integration isn&#8217;t a Tool!) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

